Subject:
|
Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 May 2000 15:21:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
781 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> No, but it might mean we need to rethink our current habits and search out
> alternatives before it reaches a crisis.
IF changing them will make a difference, and IF it's worth the price.
I'd vote for letting Florida flood, if it came to that, before I voted to give
up electricity and antibiotics.
When thinking about the global climate engine and our impact I am reminded of
the fleas on the dog who think that their bites are setting the course the dog
takes.
> There are those that scaremonger. I'm of the opinion that there is no
> definitive answer yet, but neither is it something that should be
> dismissed out of hand.
Now *those* are much more prudent words, and prudence is always a good idea.
Too bad that Al Gore is already convinced it's a done deal and George Bush is
already convinced that there isn't anything going on at all. Probably both are
wrong.
How wonderful that our two main choices this season are a panderer and an
idiot. Which is which, that's the burning question. :-)
++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
228 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|