Debate : 5620


Off-Topic / Debate / 5620	5619 \| 5621

Subject:	Re: Panderers and Idiots (was re: Global Warming)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date:	Wed, 10 May 2000 16:30:27 GMT
Viewed:	783 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: > > How wonderful that our two main choices this season are a panderer and an > idiot. Which is which, that's the burning question. :-) The panderer's the one with the fundraising problems, while the idiot is the one with the misperceptions regarding social issues. Does that clear it up? 8^) Dave! followups to OT-Fun

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Panderers and Idiots (was re: Global Warming)
(...) Wait!?! Wouldn't the panderer be the one WITHOUT fund-raising problems? Or should I revert to cynicism and simply amend that to the successful panderer? Politician - panderer, they are not two different words! :-) Bruce (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Global Warming (was: Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?)
(...) IF changing them will make a difference, and IF it's worth the price. I'd vote for letting Florida flood, if it came to that, before I voted to give up electricity and antibiotics. When thinking about the global climate engine and our impact I (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search