 | | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close —Lindsay Frederick Braun
| | | | (...) Everyone has different reasons for embracing a given philosophy--a fellow I went to college with (actually, he was a Lib candidate for Ypsilanti city council in the early 1990s) apparently switched from Dem to Lib to Rep (after being shot by a (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close —Scott Edward Sanburn
| | | | | | Lindsay, (...) time. (...) I went (...) council in (...) shot by (...) that (...) with (...) like (...) Hmm... well, I guess my political philosophy is definately right / conservative (Which, in actuality, classic liberal) / Budding Libertarian. My (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) history (...) Both the far right and left merge under totalitarianism. I came to this conclusion independently many years ago, so it seems to be fairly self-evident once you get into it. My experience is that conservatives are the ones who see (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Reagan... not exactly libertarian, but close —Lindsay Frederick Braun
| | | | | Hi, (...) It's not really a matter of right/left seeing it that way, but of "old-school/new-school" and how polarized a particular speaker is. Of course, a lot of the "new school" people are deconstructionists and think that trying to diagram (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
