Subject:
|
Re: Trying to understand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:59:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
378 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mr L F Braun wrote:
>
>
> Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bill Farkas wrote:
> >
> > > But this is not a socialist country.
> >
> > I think you need to recheck things a bit. The US has a number of
> > Socialist features. 'Socialist' isn't a black-and-white, yes-or-no
> > thing.
>
> A country can have socialist features and still not be Socialist. It's
> sort of like "Space" vs. "space"...capital-S has a very specific
> meaning, while small-s is more malleable. Semantics...with a small s.
> ;)
And that would mean that 'Socialist' is just a descriptive label,
without much specific meaning. Sort of like calling the leader of a
country 'President' doesn't mean the country is a Democracy based on
inalienable human-rights and personal freedom/responsibility.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Trying to understand
|
| (...) A country can have socialist features and still not be Socialist. It's sort of like "Space" vs. "space"...capital-S has a very specific meaning, while small-s is more malleable. Semantics...with a small s. ;) <dredge...dredge...> best LFB (24 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
