Subject:
|
Re: Trying to understand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:01:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
400 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Dave Schuler wrote:
> > It would be interesting, in hypothetical terms, to see what would happen to
> > this stance if public medical funding were eliminated, so that the gov’t no
> > longer had a financial interest to protect…
>
> Why be hypothetical? :-) Let's do it! As for those without common sense,
> think of it as evolution in action.
But would it work if some participants refused to recognize the validity
of evolution?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Trying to understand
|
| (...) Michigan has switched from secondary to primary, you can be stopped for just a seat belt infraction instead of the collateral damage (Has to be a second ticket) that CO uses. (...) Right... and that's one reason I support seat belt use, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
