 | | Re: Trying to understand —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | Generally the more laws you have, the more selectively you can enforce them, if you so choose. 22,000 gun laws are about 21,853 (Plus or minus 12) too many. How about reducing to the following: - if you allow your gun to be misused, you're liable (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —James Simpson
| | | | | (...) I agree with your points. Regarding the besmerching of reputations, I find the recent lawsuit ploys by city governments to sue gun manufacturers a farce. Gunmakers have a legal, constitutional right to exist, and they have a legal, (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Trying to understand —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Well said. Would that everyone were as reasonable as you. My theory is that in many issues we see convolution being used as a tool to usurp, because proponents on one side or another fear that a straight up and down question might: - resolve (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
