Subject:
|
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 01:18:39 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.com^IHateSpam^
|
Viewed:
|
1975 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > [...]
> > As I've said, if a thing has no effect on the tangible universe, and
> > can't be proven one way or another, it doesn't matter one way or another
> > if it's true. So I go for the simple explanation, knowing full well that
> > if god is as you say he is, I risk my mortal soul. But, since god also
> > has implications I don't care for, I choose not to rub blue mud in my
> > belly button. I'd rather be damned that worship a god (and subscribe to
> > a belief system) I feel is evil.
>
> I never thought I'd hear Larry admit that he doesn't rub blue mud in his
> belly button.
It's an old RAH reference. I actually forget if it was from Stranger,
Job, Farnhams Freehold or what.
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) I think that it is a general RAH-type comment that has found its way into several of his books... Like Larry, I'm not 100% sure., but I seem to remember it from more than one book... however, since RAH developed the "Myth as Reality" (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
