Subject:
|
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Mar 2000 18:29:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1797 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> [...]
> As I've said, if a thing has no effect on the tangible universe, and
> can't be proven one way or another, it doesn't matter one way or another
> if it's true. So I go for the simple explanation, knowing full well that
> if god is as you say he is, I risk my mortal soul. But, since god also
> has implications I don't care for, I choose not to rub blue mud in my
> belly button. I'd rather be damned that worship a god (and subscribe to
> a belief system) I feel is evil.
I never thought I'd hear Larry admit that he doesn't rub blue mud in his
belly button.
:)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) At last, something I can agree with. This is most certainly true. (reminder, accepting the truth of "If A then B" does NOT imply the truth of A) Bill, there isn't much common ground between us, though, as other posters have explained quite (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
