 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes [and I re-arranged]: (...) Ooh. It appears that my argument has no support for such a trichotomy. My kneejerk reaction is that you're pointing out a flaw in my semantics rather than my logic, but (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'd still go with Shrugged. Go buy it and if you're really pressed for time, just read Galt's speech, which is only 100 pages or so (quite a bit much for a radio speech but what the heck...). It starts around page 700 or so IIRC (I'd go look (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Karim Nassar
|
| | | | (...) Who's John Galt? <ducks> ;) --Karim (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) $ (the sign of the dollar) <... and grins> (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
