Subject:
|
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Mar 2000 08:00:41 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
sgore@superonline./spamcake/com
|
Viewed:
|
1005 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Peter Callaway writes:
> > Dan Boger wrote:
> > > well now. I've decided years ago that if there is such a thing as god,
> > > I'd refer to it as a she, just because that will make things more
> > > interesting. I never said that said God is the one mentioned in the
> > > Bible, or the Koran, or the Tora... as my wife rightly points out, who
> > > cares what chromosomes God has, if it's xx or xy? why would god even
> > > have a gender?
> >
> > You've decided that God is a she just to make things more interesting.
> > That's about as rational as me calling you "Rebecca" just to make things
> > more interesting. You may say that's OK, I can call you what I want, but
> > the fact remains that it is not who you are. Calling someone by a different
> > name or different gender just to make things interesting is arrogant.
>
> Say, this bring up an interesting point (for me, anyway). I'm curious about
> something...
>
> Over my lifetime, I've heard God referred to as He millions of times, and in
> more recent years, occasionally I've heard Him referred to as She, but I
> don't think I've ever heard God referred to yet as It or Thon.
>
> To a theist, would someone referring to God as It (rather than He) be
> considered insulting, or would it be flattering since it acknowledged that
> God is more than human and doesn't necessarily need a gender?
>
> A second question -- which is more insulting: She or It? That is, is it
> worse for God to be female than to be genderless?
>
> --Todd
It's just an European language thing isn't it? We have only one word for
third singular person in Turkish, "o". So a Turkish speaking christian
it doesn't make any difference, if that thing called god is a male,
female or neither.
Isn't it also make things looking much more stupid? There is a supreme
being, and besides materializing as having a human body, he/she/it also
have gender. There is also a "semi-god" thing, a son of a god. This is
not coinciding with being a supreme thing. Any possibility of being
influenced from Roman/Greek Parthenon(sp?)?
Selçuk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) Say, this bring up an interesting point (for me, anyway). I'm curious about something... Over my lifetime, I've heard God referred to as He millions of times, and in more recent years, occasionally I've heard Him referred to as She, but I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
