 | | Re: Mormon bashing again —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) lacks. (...) before (...) and (...) the (...) And they have in fact found intermediary forms that predate Archaeopteryx recently in China (or was it Mongolia, sorry, I forget). A more definite mix of dinosaur and bird. There are plenty of (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Mormon bashing again —Bill Farkas
|
| | | | (...) reproduce (...) the (...) before (...) These were also admitted to be a hoax shortly after being released. Bill (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mormon bashing again —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) - (...) to (...) See what I mean? If you mean the proto-birds, that's not true (your source, please). If you mean something else, you'll have to clue me in since I mention no other specific example and neither do you. Bruce (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mormon bashing again —Bill Farkas
|
| | | | (...) I heard it on the radio news - AP or USA - they were going to exhibit them and then it was announced that they were fake. Best I can do. Bill (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mormon bashing again —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) See July 98 National Geographic, "Dinosaurs Take Wing". I have seen no report of them being fake in any scientific journal, newspaper, or on-line source. Bruce (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
