 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | (...) And also... sounds like it's OK to have other Gods "after me" - ie Himself as chief god and then a load of minor ones? I don't remember that being OK <g> Kevin (24 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Erik Olson
|
| | | | ObLego follows. (...) It's murky enough. Too bad God is not actually out there to explain himself. Modern religion retroactively rules on these loopholes to say what's OK. The ambiguous hints at what the OT people believed about other deities (and (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods? —Ben Roller
|
| | | | (...) Hmm...since TLC wasn't around yet to call them studs, I guess God just called them "cubits" instead. 300 long, 50 wide and 30 high... Yep, that should just about hold every pair of animals that they make. And that whole "take it down and (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
