 | | Good/Bad/Neutral (Was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Richard Franks
|
| | | (...) :) This is another either-or trap. I don't believe that people are inherently good, neither do I believe that people are inherently bad. Rather, I believe that peoples actions and thoughts are moulded by the environmental and social structures (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Good/Bad/Neutral (Was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) inherently (...) believe (...) social (...) One problem is that those who believe in the inherent goodness of people sometimes shortcut things. What we really believe is that everyone has the inherent (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Good/Bad/Neutral (Was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) Agreed! (...) Fence suggests a dichotomy, besides which, birthing atop a fence could be dangerous! I am curious as to why you think we are born 'good'. Not arguing, just curious - my reasoning would initially follow the evolutionary model, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
