Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 20:31:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@NOMORESPAMnovera.com
|
Viewed:
|
2299 times
|
| |
|
|
<3884AEDA.9C6DA48F@eclipse.net> <FoJMsz.K0p@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Richard Franks wrote:
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
>
> > If, in addition to whatever
> > the company could be sued for, the president, CEO, board of directors,
> > and potentially stock holders could be held jointly and severally
> > liable, companies would never hurt people in ways that could come back
> > to haunt them.
>
> Does that responsibility follow them from job to job too? What about when
> they've retired? If the answer is 'no' to either of them, then I don't think
> that will work.
I'd say the answer is yes to both. You don't get to commit a crime, then
just change jobs and use that as a defense.
>
> Richard
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Using a country in the middle of ethnic cleansing as a comparison is hardly flattering. You can get shot in any country, but it's more likely to happen if you live in the US than say the UK. (...) I find it easy to believe, however I would (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
