To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 392
391  |  393
Subject: 
Re: Frog
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 9 Feb 1999 00:55:06 GMT
Viewed: 
509 times
  
Tim McSweeney wrote in message ...

Possibly, I guess my answer to that is simple, In questions of morality
there is no absolute truth.  We may have grown up in a society with rules • so
strict (such as not eating people) that the seem like absolutes but I • assure
you they are not, Morals are defined purely by the society we live in, they
differ, they change and evolve.


Well, I think a lot of people disagree with that on religious grounds, but
since I don't want to get into that I'll disagree with it on
logical/philosophical grounds:


I think all societies have certain underlying morals that can be considered
absolute given that all societies share them.  Certain things have to be
wrong or the society would fall apart.  Most important among them might be
the prohibition against killing someone in your in group.  Out group, maybe,
but not in group.  Running around killing people aimlessly has to be wrong,
or the society that thinks it right would go extinct.

Jesse

__________________________________________________________________
Jesse The Jolly Jingoist
Looking for answers?
Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! http://www.multicon.de/fun/legofaq.html
Power-search in Deja News! http://www.dejanews.com/home_ps.shtml



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Frog
 
(...) maybe, (...) Not true, Our own society until recently practiced capital punishment, If this isn't sanctioned killing in-Group then I don't know what is. No-one does anything aimlessly, I don't even brush my teeth without some motive. I agree (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Frog
 
I agree with Jesse here. Why are you so reluctant to acknowledge the possibility of absolutes? (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Frog
 
(...) There are too many things in the world to derive all of them from first principals. I accept all sorts of things that I was taught without reasoning through them fully, I suspect you do as well. If there are some issues that we each feel the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR