Subject:
|
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 15 Jan 2000 21:42:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2367 times
|
| |
|
|
"Scott E. Sanburn" wrote:
>
> Christopher Weeks wrote:
> > Most people say the Republican party is for the rich. How so, when I am
> > considered poor / lower middle class?
> >
> > Probably for complex social reasons having more to do with what your
> > parents believed than what you have reasoned out about the way the world
> > works. This is, I believe, why most party afiliation exists.
>
> Bzzt. Wrong! No, both of my parents were registered Democrats. I looked
Exactly! So you chose the opposite party.
> at what the parties stood for, looked at my religious beliefs, and
Sure. I'm not saying that those things have nothing to do with it. You
obviously give these issues some thought, but I still say that people
have more hidden baggage behind these kinds of decisions than they
typically know.
> concluded the Republican party is more to what I believe in. Though I am
> definitely more to the Libertarian side than to the Rockefeller side.
That would seem to suggest that you think the libertarian side is the
conservative side. I would strongly disagree. If I had to use that
silly single dimension to rank them, I'd say that the Libertarians are
weakly on the side of the Republicans rather than the Democrats, but
they're certainly not conservative Republicans. That rank is designated
for whacked out religious fascists.
> I have seen too many examples of socialism failing, and the Democratic
> party seems to be the place for leftists, socialists, etc. That is why.
> I could care less what my parents do, in terms of their voting record.
I believe that you could care less.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
