Debate : 3474


Off-Topic / Debate / 3474	3473 \| 3475

Subject:	Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 21:46:15 GMT
Reply-To:	mattdm@mattdm.[AntiSpam]org
Viewed:	1202 times

Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote: > Then they shouldn't have had children in the first place, so the correct > course of action would obviously be to throw the parent in jail and throw > the kid out on the street, where it may or may not be picked up by a > private orphanage. Unless they can get a private charity to sponsor their > kid, of course. This would also be a good solution if the parents are on crack (perfectly legal in the libertarian utopia) and not really into making sure their kid gets taken care of (let alone educated). -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) YM, throwing the parents into jail and throwing the kid out on the streets? I fail to see the overall improvement. Jasper (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) You mean just like they do now? (Home schooling was ruled constitutional, IIRC. At any rate, it took the courts.) (...) And who certifies the certfier? IOW, quis custodet custodies? I'd guess that would have to be either a fourth-party, (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search