To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3418
3417  |  3419
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 06:03:53 GMT
Viewed: 
2814 times
  
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 04:57:18 GMT, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller)
wrote:
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
IPblocking such a thing would not block very many legitimate users.

Not so at all. I'd just use a dialup account (plenty of bandwidth to deal
with the discussion traffic) at one or several major ISPs. I don't think
Todd wants to break Earthlink or AOL access for all of Boston.

If one must. I also think you'd have the lawyers sicced on you. Things
like this are blatantly illegal.

As added protection, Todd could make the NNTP connections
password-protected (fairly easily, even, technically). In which case
you'd need to do a false web apply for privileges before getting news.
Which is very blatantly illegal - could be a testcase for "lying in
writing" applied to the web ;)

Well, consider the possiblity of Todd shutting down LUGnet over the
potential appearance of copyright violation in the linking-to-Lego's-site
Y2K set issue a little bit ago. I'd suggest that Todd only felt compelled to
do so exactly because of it being totally under his control. I don't think
that if the same information had been posted to, say, RTL, he woulda been
clamoring for Usenet to be shut down until things were sorted out.

Yes. I think so too. But I disagree with your conclusion - the
benefits outweigh the doubts. You need a single guiding hand. Most
Open-Source projects aren't run by democratic fiat either. Canonical
example: linux-kernel.

If this were just about news, a dedicated hierarchy, run on dedicated
servers, with possibly a web-interface thrown in, I'd agree with you,
but it isn't.

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Not so at all. I'd just use a dialup account (plenty of bandwidth to deal with the discussion traffic) at one or several major ISPs. I don't think Todd wants to break Earthlink or AOL access for all of Boston. (...) Spoofing IPs probably (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR