Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian theory and altruism (was: some incorrectly spelled thing not worth repeating
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 04:54:04 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.comIHATESPAM
|
Viewed:
|
638 times
|
| |
|
|
Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> > I'm glad that you agree with me that it's not altruism per se that is
> > required. In turn, I agree with you on what IS required. Long term
> > thinking. That seems to be in rather short (1) supply these days. • [snip]
> > Would things be different in a different system? What if it was more
>
> This is what disturbs me about libertarian theory. It seems just as
> idealistic as socialist theory. If the system were totally different,
> worker-owned collectives would work wonderfully as a way to organize the
> world. But it requires a lot of different!
Well, no. I believe that I can demonstrate why a collective will always
fail, no matter how different the system, unless you can repeal cause
and effect.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
