To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3386
3385  |  3387
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 04:08:45 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm.NOMORESPAMorg
Viewed: 
5353 times
  
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
> Yes. But doing so without Todd's knowledge, _while keeping it up tom
> date_, is next to impossible.

Wouldn't be without his knowledge. He'd just be powerless to stop it without
blocking large numbers of legitimate users. Not that I'm advocating such a
thing in any way.

> Then there is the fact that by far not everything in lugnet is public
> - the CGI and other various bits-o-script holding the thing together aren't
> publically available.

Yes that's again true.



> A constantly updated copy of the original would be essentially a
> mirror - and assuming that you copy the ability to post as well, and
> gateway both ways, it might actually make sense to do something like
> that, someday. With Todd's consent, of course.

This is a different topic entirely of course. It certainly would be
possible, and something I'd really like to see. Not that I think Todd is
doing a bad job, but I don't like the single-point-of-failure thing.

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) IPblocking such a thing would not block very many legitimate users. Unless you start doing things like spoofing IPs (which can be detected at a firewall level), morphing ISP accounts, etc.etc. Come to think of it, IPblocking of spoofed packets (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Yes. But doing so without Todd's knowledge, _while keeping it up tom date_, is next to impossible. I suspect somebody who downloaded the entire site would show up a significant blip in traffic, also. Then there is the fact that by far not (...) (27 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR