To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3371
3370  |  3372
Subject: 
Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:37:32 GMT
Viewed: 
2443 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:

A community I lived in for a while didn't have access to a public library,
because the majority (but not an overwhelming majority -- something like
60%) of the people who lived there didn't want to pay the few cents in
taxes to join the regional library program. And it wasn't because they were
building a privately-held public library of their own.

So move to a community which does have a library.

That's fine for the people who can afford to do so. Wouldn't this create a set
of uber communities that had all the services, and lower class communities that
had no services and people couldn't afford to move out of? Seriously, why not
just send them down the mines just now?

How are children supposed to move to different community anyway? Or is it fine
to deny them the right to educate themselves because the concept of tax is
supposedly evil?

I would take your comment as being flippant, but I do believe that it reflects
Libitarian policy regarding the funding of social services, which is the scary
part.


I would submit that universal education and access to libraries (whether or
not a right) are good things. I'm not convinced that this would happen in a
purely free capitalist system.

If it's worth the cost, it will happen. If it isn't worth the cost, then it
isn't worth the cost.

Worth the cost to whom? Libitarian views suggest that services would be
provided by third party service providers. What if education needs subsidies -
ie the majority of parents can't afford to give their children an education
without taxes?

Ah - move to a different community and leave the poor people to their mud?


Another thought, I think many of the longer existing
public libraries were actually established with a lot of donated money.

Possibly because those who were born in a time of low educational access
realise the true value of libraries, whereas we seem to take them for granted

Richard

PS. Please don't take my tone personally, the impact that Libitarian policies
could have is just sinking in to me.. although I may have misinterpreted :)



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Presumably, if a society as a whole gets richer from educating the poor, companies will donate enough to make it possible. The big fallacy is that the vast majority of companies don't look further ahead than next quarter, up to a year or maybe (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
weird problem.. (...) that (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) that (...) That (...) taxes (...) So move to a community which does have a library. (...) If it's worth the cost, it will happen. If it isn't worth the cost, then it isn't worth the cost. Another thought, I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR