| |
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:41:20 GMT, John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net>
wrote:
> Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> > a whole different definition of what constitutes "child pornography". Some
> > people in this country (USA) believe a simple nude constitutes child
> > pornography.
>
> ??? A nude "child pornography"? You need a child in there somewhere!
A nude _child_. Duh.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) there are nude chidren in brian froud's work. ( the stunning "fairies", "lady cottington's pressed fairie book", good fairies; bad fairies", etc.) anyone who would consider these paintings child pornography is themselves morally decayed. julia (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) Well, potentially, depends upon how convincing I am;-) (...) ??? A nude "child pornography"? You need a child in there somewhere! (...) It would qualify under many people's definition. 1. Art is subjective....check 2. Art is thought (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
