To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3242
3241  |  3243
Subject: 
Re: Swearing?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 00:01:59 GMT
Viewed: 
3499 times
  
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 23:57:47 GMT, "Bruce Schlickbernd"
<corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:

> And what is my definition of art?  If people are not convinced that something
> is art, it isn't!

Define "people". For any given piece, there will be at least one
person who thinks it is art[1].

Jasper

[1] The artist is usually the first.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swearing?
 
(...) the (...) be (...) What gave you that impression? I most certainly did not. Would you call child (...) That's a crime, no matter how artistically put. Someone from France might have a whole different definition of what constitutes "child (...) (27 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR