To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3242
3241  |  3243
Subject: 
Re: Swearing?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 00:01:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1725 times
  
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 23:57:47 GMT, "Bruce Schlickbernd"
<corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:

And what is my definition of art?  If people are not convinced that something
is art, it isn't!

Define "people". For any given piece, there will be at least one
person who thinks it is art[1].

Jasper

[1] The artist is usually the first.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swearing?
 
(...) the (...) be (...) What gave you that impression? I most certainly did not. Would you call child (...) That's a crime, no matter how artistically put. Someone from France might have a whole different definition of what constitutes "child (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR