Subject:
|
Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 27 Dec 1998 21:12:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@&SayNoToSpam&newsguy.com
|
Viewed:
|
1054 times
|
| |
|
|
Beaker <beaker@havoc.gtf.org> wrote:
> Also sprach Matt Hanson:
> : You have more articulately described what I was hoping that I would not
> : have to. I don't think there was a single word I disagreed with, other
> : than the part about your seemingly condoning discreet extramarital
> : affairs.
>
> I *do* condone discreet affairs ... I do not see what the possible
> relevance is to being capable of leading a country. But if your
> behavior gets you into trouble, and you try to subvert the legal system
> to avoid it, you should reap the whirlwind. Not for the sex, but for
> the attempted cover-up.
You know, if Bill & Hillary have an understanding that it is "ok" for
each of them them to sleep around, then I could understand what you're
saying.
If, however, they have the kind of marriage that the vast majority of
people enter into, one with an implicit understanding of faithfulness,
I don't understand it.
So you either can accept that he's breaking his vows to his wife and
she doesn't mind, which makes sense, because if she doesn't mind why
should you? Or you're saying that you condone the violating of one
person's trust by another. Which is the same as lying, right?
Lying is irrelevant to leading a country?
--
Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/ (discontinued thru Holiday season)
800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 ext 222 (S@H Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Meet more LEGO fans in your area through LUGNET
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| Mike Stanley wrote in message ... <snip> (...) Lying is probaly the most important part of leading a country I mean, you have to look the Chinese whatever in the eyes and say "No the American People want to trade with you, we don't think your a (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| Also sprach Mike Stanley: : So you either can accept that he's breaking his vows to his wife and : she doesn't mind, which makes sense, because if she doesn't mind why : should you? Or you're saying that you condone the violating of one : person's (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| Also sprach Matt Hanson: : You have more articulately described what I was hoping that I would not : have to. I don't think there was a single word I disagreed with, other : than the part about your seemingly condoning discreet extramarital : (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
