Subject:
|
Re: Clinton: Amoral?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Dec 1998 04:47:44 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
beaker@NOSPAMpobox.com
|
Viewed:
|
776 times
|
| |
|
|
Also sprach Larry Pieniazek:
: Wow. Great job.
<blush> ... thanks:)
/ _ _ / _ _ It's lonely at the top, but you eat better.
()(-(//((-/
============= Jim Baker -- Weather Weasel Extraordinaire ==============
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Clinton: Amoral?
|
| Beaker wrote: <masterful essay, clearly delineating the key points about rule of law> Wow. Great job. Some key points I think need more amplification: - Jim feels, as I do, that the current sexual harassement laws are flawed, but that the president (...) (26 years ago, 24-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
