To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28307
28306  |  28308
Subject: 
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:57:25 GMT
Viewed: 
5263 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:
   I completely disagree with this. By posting in a public forum you are inviting other participants of that forum to your discussion.

Not necessarily. Sure, anyone who is a member is free to read and respond to any given post, but unless there is a “comments welcome”or “LMKYT”, for example, responses aren’t solicited. When I post a MOC, I do not do so in order to receive feedback. Simply sharing and participating in the community is reward in and of itself.

I still disagree. By posting in a public forum you are, in my opinion, soliciting and inviting response. If you do not wish response, or if you wish only certain people to respond you should either not post or take it to email.

Okay, we agree to disagree.

  
   This reminds me of a noob a while back who posted some things and was miffed and hurt that his posts weren’t commented upon. I remember thinking, “if you want feedback, you should ask for it.” And conversely, if comments aren’t solicited, then they aren’t necessary desired.

I agree with that but it is a different issue. By posting you solicit response, by asking you request response.

“Solicit” and “request” are synonymous.

   It’s the difference between yelling your opinion to a party and asking people’s opinions on what you say.


I don’t see that example as analogous.

  
  
   You can take it to email if you don’t want public responses. To post publically and not expect response is, in my opinion, the height of bad manners, it’s like shouting a conversation in a busy room but demanding everyone else ignores it.

I didn’t say “expected”; I said solicited. Of course I’m not surprised when people chime in, but I don’t expect responses to posts for which I haven’t asked.

JOHN

I think you should expect responses. That’s the whole point of a public forum.

I disagree. The point of a public forum is to share information and ideas. That can be 2-way, but not necessarily so at all. Artists spark debates and discussions through their work, but rarely with the artist him/herself. Are we not brick artists? (you even more so in the virtual world:-)

   The onus is on you to ignore or respond to subsequent responses, not on someone else to not post when you don’t want them to.

I don’t believe that there is any onus at all.

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Sure (...) They're not actually although my understanding of solicit was wrong too. (URL) Invite and request are synonymous but different. And that is one of the greatest and most confusing things about the English language. Tim (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) I still disagree. By posting in a public forum you are, in my opinion, soliciting and inviting response. If you do not wish response, or if you wish only certain people to respond you should either not post or take it to email. (...) I agree (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR