 | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Ah, yes. Dr. Rice's famous "smoking gun mushroom cloud" argument. Sorry, but that's not sufficient. Hussein did not have and was not actively seeking a nuclear weapons program, so any argument based on that premise is invalid. It may be the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | Hey all :) (...) That doesn't do much to address the point, Dave! You're right, but John probably is too. (...) To secure a stronghold on the oil-fields of the Middle-East in preparation for protecting the US supply chain and projecting force into (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Hey, Chris-- long time! (...) clunk (jaw on desk) (...) I would. It's honest and correct. We shouldn't have to apologize for protecting our national interests IMO. Nobody else would. (...) spppp (monitor sprayed by pop) LOL (...) Is that the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Well, that is only thanks to the Israelis when they wiped out Osiraq. (...) Please. Radicals would have nuked us long before Bush had they the means and opportunity. (...) Which is exactly why we shouldn't allow them to acquire them! (...) (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Tim David
|
| | | | (...) Me, I have more respect for someone who has a naughty shag than someone is the cause of hundreds of thousands of people dying. Tim (17 years ago, 24-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
