 | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) But they are entitled to certain protections that, by design, are denied to this latest batch. For example, prisoners of war are to be released at the war's end, but Dubya has pretty clearly stated that the War on Terror will never be over. So (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Excellent question. I don't know. But I do know that if they are released, they will attack us again. (...) No, I think it was in response to a new category of enemy who isn't represented by a nation-state. They don't deserve a trial by jury. (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Dave Schuler
| | | | | | (...) John, with due respect, you don't know that. Many of these detainees were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time, or they were mistaken for someone else, or they were coerced into fighting against invading US forces. We have only the word (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Thomas Stangl
| | | | | | (...) Do you? You stated in the post before this that you have no idea what info the gubmint has on these people, now you seem to know the facts. Which is it? You know, incarceration != guilt. The gubmint either needs to take the time to prove (...) (17 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Tim David
| | | | | (...) I'm not sure an American can really use that argument without being hypocritical. (Hey, Britain's record on the subject isn't too great either, before you say anything) Tim (17 years ago, 24-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
