Subject:
|
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:28:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3685 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
But what about governments like the Taliban and SH’s regime that sponsored
terrorism? These pukes don’t operate in a void. They need safe haven from
governments. Holding these governments accountable for the actions of
terrorists whom they sponsor is perfectly justified in my mind.
JOHN
|
I’m not sure an American can really use that argument without being
hypocritical. (Hey, Britain’s record on the subject isn’t too great either,
before you say anything)
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
| (...) Excellent question. I don't know. But I do know that if they are released, they will attack us again. (...) No, I think it was in response to a new category of enemy who isn't represented by a nation-state. They don't deserve a trial by jury. (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
