 | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —John Neal
| | | | (...) "Single attack"? Do you forget (among many others) the first bombing at the WTC, Dave!? Maybe this debate needs to begin with the idea of whether or not we are at war. Are we? JOHN (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Of course not--RW radio mentions it daily, every time they blame Clinton for 9/11. (...) Okay, so two attacks in a decade constitute an invasion? Sorry, but "invasion" implies the insertion of a substantial military presence into the target (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em??? —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Only because no other scenario was imagined. So it would be your opinion that, if a scenario of terrorist attacks like 9-11 were somehow proposed to the FF, they wouldn't include that form of violence in their "invasion or rebellion" (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
