 | | Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!! —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) All that "ultimate punishment" talk is, alas, straight from the George W. Bush buzzword lexicon. In typical Dubya fashion, it enables him to sound tough without actually taking a definitive stand. Since I know you to be a person of conviction (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | The Ultimate Discussion (was: Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!) —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Now, now, settle down, Dave! I'm pretty sure that the word "ultimate" pre-existed some apocryphal, presidential playbook and no association with OFL whatsoever was intended. (...) Let's see. (...) See? You got it on the first try! :-) (...) (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Ultimate Discussion (was: Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!) —Ross Crawford
| | | | | (...) Ahhh, but see is unrestrained murder of thousands of your subjects "more ultimate" than the murder of the guy that breaks into your house? If so, how can murder be the "ultimate crime"? If not, why do they carry different sentences? (...) (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
