To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2761
2760  |  2762
Subject: 
Re: What is a set, philosophically
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:26:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1453 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> I would say that the status of your having a set or not depends on the
> purpose of making the claim. For the ultimate in collectibility, every
> set must be in the condition it arrived at the retailers when first
> released. For the purposes of having the satisfaction of being able to
> display a particular model, all you need is the bricks to build that
> model, even if you have to cannibalize another model. For the purposes
> of inventorying your collection, and getting a quick estimate of how
> many bricks you own, you should only count sets that are complete or
> almost so, and not count sets you could possibly build from the
> components.

  In terms of collectability, I agree with you completely; I should have been
more specific.
  Here's that aforementioned DejaNews link:

http://x41.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=416977265.1&CONTEXT=944760325.1620967669&hitnu
m=0

   Not to be taken too seriously!

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: What is a set, philosophically
 
(...) Hellooo LEGOnauts, I have to say that a set does consist of unique pieces and the common pieces that make up a model. These can come from any source, such as *the storage box* or the original package. The original box is not necessary for this (...) (27 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: What is a set, philosophically
 
I would say that the status of your having a set or not depends on the purpose of making the claim. For the ultimate in collectibility, every set must be in the condition it arrived at the retailers when first released. For the purposes of having (...) (27 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR