 | | Re: Heads up, atheists —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) I'm surprised that this is going to court, honestly. How can you prove that someone didn't exist ~2000 years ago? The best you can do, IMO, is show that the evidence doesn't support the conclusion that he existed. AFAIC, the Gospels are (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists —John Neal
| | | | | | (...) Agreed. Kinda like the Scopes trial in reverse;-) (...) He sets up a classic error-- he has so-called proofs that he has written about that Jesus didn't exist-- he claims it is up to the other side to prove him wrong. (...) Even moreso the (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists —Dave Schuler
| | | | | | | (...) I suspect that Jason Robards won't be starring in the film version of this one, though. (...) That's not always unreasonable, except when the necessary disproof is so burdensome that it becomes practically impossible. If I asserted that my (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Then again, maybe it (URL) won't.> Dave! (19 years ago, 27-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) Then again, maybe it (URL) was thrown out.> Personally, I thought that the whole undertaking was a waste of time. Good riddance to some pointless litigation. Dave! (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Heads up, atheists —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Remember that Tootsie Pop® commercial where the "scientist" is doing the experiment to finally find out how many licks does it take to reach the center of the Tootsie Pop sucker? "One, two, thareee, <crunch>...." "Three." As for our story and (...) (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
