Debate : 2691


Off-Topic / Debate / 2691	2690 \| 2692

Subject:	Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 1999 06:47:56 GMT
Viewed:	811 times

In lugnet.general, "James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> writes: > [...] There are people out there who feel that their desire to see a > picture *right now* overrides the Lego Company's right to control > images they own. [...] I agree, and it's pretty damn sad to watch, IMHO. I *really* wish now that I'd waited just a little longer, back when I added a couple SW pix to the DB after rebelscum.com put them up. It wasn't very much longer after that before legitimate pix showed up in catalogs. I set a bad example. --Todd

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
(...) (leaping out of bed to follow-up on this) Wait a second. The pictures that went in were legitimate consumer catalog photos -- from the sheet catalog/brochure someone got in a copy of a Technic set at a store in the UK, and from one other. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.database)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
Just some minor nits...I putting this into .debate because it feels confrontational to me, and I'm responding in kind. Even if it's not confrontational at me. (...) The only rants I saw were people jumping on the "dictatorship" bandwagon. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search