Subject:
|
Re: Heinlein, Card and Webcomics: fans, art, and disappointment
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:37:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1069 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > From Websnark(1) for 2 April 2005.
> >
> > I have in the past said how much I like RAH, and how much I enjoy the work of
> > OSC (not as much as RAH, but I do).
> >
> > Yet I still agree with Eric, and with Aerie too (at Queen of Wands, anothe rof
> > the many comics I read)... embrace the good and yet still disagree with the bad.
> > Eric and I disagree on some things about RAH but I get his point.
> >
> > 1 - I read "too many" web comics... so of COURSE I read Websnark, so I can find
> > out about other good ones and make things worse
>
> Bobby Heinlein I can figure out...Orson Scott Card? (not that I've read a
> single word by the guy).
His fiction writing is good. Especially if you stick to stuff he wrote when he
was younger and to stuff that ISN'T part 5 of a 19 part series.
He talks about stuff that most of us embrace, tolerance, self reliance, growth
as an individual, and lots of other great themes.
But the problem is, as Aerie says... his non fiction is wonky. Or just whacked.
Not making too big a deal of it, I just thought it was an interesting ref for
those that didn't/hadn't seen it...
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
3 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
