| | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) Richard Franks
|
| | (...) Ah, but the law of diminishing returns states.... :) :) Richard (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Who said I didn't factor that in?? :-) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) Richard Franks
|
| | | | | (...) But did you? :) Answers on the back of a 6277 to the usual address... Richard (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) John VanZwieten
|
| | | | Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospa...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FMCELH.J2s@lugnet.com... (...) By the way, it's the law of diminishing _marginal_ returns, and all it states is that at _some_ point, additional units of a good will provide (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) Richard Franks
|
| | | | (...) I stand corrected! :) (...) True, but I'd compare 1 LEGO set to 1 packet of M&Ms, as opposed to 1 LEGO set to 1 M&M. In general of course, I'm not into trains so if I was maybe my perception would be different. Although, if LEGO Direct helps (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |