Subject:
|
Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 23:29:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1723 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Jasper Janssen wrote:
> > No, no, no. Your need for 20 isn't less valid than someone else's need
> > for 1. But 20 persons needing one getting satisfied _does_ make for a
> > larger overall level of happiness.
>
> How so? I am more than 20 times increased in happiness than the average
> increase in happiness of those 20 other fellas... so the larger overall
> level of happiness is on my side...
>
> :-)
Ah, but the law of diminishing returns states.... :) :)
Richard
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
| Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospa...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FMCELH.J2s@lugnet.com... (...) By the way, it's the law of diminishing _marginal_ returns, and all it states is that at _some_ point, additional units of a good will provide (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
163 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
