Debate : 2649


Off-Topic / Debate / 2649	2648 \| 2650

Subject:	Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 6 Dec 1999 06:56:19 GMT
Viewed:	21 times

You mean like the 1886 SW bucket that never showed up, that MIGHT show up now under a 71xx number? Personally, I'll have to agree with Onyx here - no matter how sugar-coated it was, Todd and Suz's posts come across to ME (as in they seemed to ME like) as bullying Huw into taking them down, and that bothers the HELL out of me, as I normally see eye-to-eye with Todd. The only reason I think Huw should take them down is if someone shows him a full catalog with actual legalese as to NOT redistributing the data inside. Otherwise, let freedom (of information) reign. Jonathan Wilson wrote: > I can see a point to some of this discussion... for example if TLG later sends an > addendum to the catalog because they have dropped certain sets and us AFOLS have > seen the sets then we will get annoyed and pester TLG as to why the sets have not > appeared. > > -- > Jonathan Wilson > wilsonj@xoommail.com > http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/ -- Tom Stangl ***http://www.vfaq.com/ ***DSM Visual FAQ home ***http://ba.dsm.org/ ***SF Bay Area DSMs

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
You will notice that in the 2000 in set catalog, there is just a page with some info on the dinosaurs sets, no pictures. Thanks to huw we have (had) pictures of them. There is probobly a good reason why the pictures are not in the in box catalog but (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
(...) Kinda exactly like that, yeah.[1] (...) Yikes. Wow. Well, I'm going to have to tone down my opinions then, if it came across that way. More disclaimers needed, or something. Persuade through logical argument, yes. Bully, no. (I'm speaking for (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
(...) Some facts. 1.Huw does not havethe catolog, he got the pictures from a source, who has not signed any aggrements tthat they would not publicise the information in the dealers catalog, there in nothing anywhere that prohibits redistribution of (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search