To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26434
26433  |  26435
Subject: 
To David T Johnson, Acting ambassador, US Embassy, London
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:46:12 GMT
Viewed: 
609 times
  
From the pages of the Guardian...


Dear Mr Johnson, On November 26, your press counsellor sent a letter to the Guardian taking strong exception to a sentence in my column of the same day. The sentence read: “In Iraq, US forces and their Iraqi surrogates are no longer bothering to conceal attacks on civilian targets and are openly eliminating anyone - doctors, clerics, journalists - who dares to count the bodies.” Of particular concern was the word “eliminating”.

The letter suggested that my charge was “baseless” and asked the Guardian either to withdraw it, or provide “evidence of this extremely grave accusation”. It is quite rare for US embassy officials to openly involve themselves in the free press of a foreign country, so I took the letter extremely seriously. But while I agree that the accusation is grave, I have no intention of withdrawing it. Here, instead, is the evidence you requested... more



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: To David T Johnson, Acting ambassador, US Embassy, London
 
(...) Which goes part and parcel with this paper-- (URL) if ya don't feel like slugging thru that, see a journalistic synopsis-- (URL) off great-- "THE Pentagon has admitted that the war on terror and the invasion and occupation of Iraq have (...) (20 years ago, 6-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR