 | | Crucial Endorsement for Bush —Scott Arthur
|
| | | Saying it like it is... Hasan Rowhani (Head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council) We haven't seen anything good from the Democrats... We do not desire to see Democrats take over ... We should not forget that most sanctions and economic (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Crucial Endorsement for Bush —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah, the contents of supermarket tabloids are usually pretty funny, but maybe they should include a few more alien abduction stories in the Guardian so people don't forget what they're reading. I mean some people took them seriously the other (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Crucial Endorsement for Bush —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) Inclined though you may be to dismiss the Guardian, perhaps you should factor the ramblings of the ultraliberal Weekly Standard into your "funny" calculations: (URL) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Crucial Endorsement for Bush —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | | | (...) confusing than funny. What is this Weekly (Daily?) Standard? Is it some sort of satire mag? It doesn't seem to get quoted much here. Don (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Crucial Endorsement for Bush —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) junk to back your case. Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Crucial Endorsement for Bush —Don Heyse
|
| | | | | | (...) Oops, you're right. They aren't scheduled to (URL) switch to tabloid format> until 2006. I stand corrected. Sorry, it seemed funny at the time. Heh, love that (URL) wikipedia>. Who knew George Soros was involved with the Guardian? Anyhow, do (...) (20 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Crucial Endorsement for Bush —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) I wouldn't read too much into this sort of political endorsement. The same sort of thing happened four years ago, when Saddam was very much in support of Gore (because Bush's dad whupped him) while Pol Pot supported Bush because he'd been (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
