 | | Religious Freedom Claim Taken Too Far? —Frank Filz
|
| | | Here's an interesting one: (URL) pharmacist refused to fill a contraceptive prescription for religious reasons. That might be ok, except, he also refused to transfer the prescription to another pharmacy. Now he's claiming he shouldn't be punished. (...) (20 years ago, 12-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Religious Freedom Claim Taken Too Far? —J. Spencer Rezkalla
|
| | | | (...) Seems like a no-brainer to me. That guy should lose his license. What's next: doctors refusing to provide medication because it violates some principle of faith healing? Newsflash: In this country we live under the Laws of the United States of (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Religious Freedom Claim Taken Too Far? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Well, right now we *nominally* live under the laws of America--if the Spawn of Satan is re-appointed in November, then we'll see what happens to those laws. Anyway, I completely agree with the meat of your post. The guy's welcome to believe (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Religious Freedom Claim Taken Too Far? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) From a libertarian perspective, I'll grant the pharmacist the right to discriminate. What I don't grant him the right to do though is interfere. Refusing to fill a prescription is discrimination. Refusal to forward the prescription to someone (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Religious Freedom Claim Taken Too Far? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Actually, the doctor-to-pharmacy direct link hadn't occurred to me. My family doctor usually still gives us a script and we take it to the pharmacist, though she sometimes calls in the prescription directly, with our permission. That would (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Religious Freedom Claim Taken Too Far? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Well, perhaps force is too strong, though I'm comfortable with anything the government requires as being forced in that ultimately, if you refuse, the government could escalate to use of force. I agree that the pharmacist's contract may very (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Religious Freedom Claim Taken Too Far? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) I'm not so sure. If the individual citizen enters into and then defaults upon the social contract, then that's not initiation of force--it's enforcement of terms. (...) Now that's interesting. In a true market of options, then a choice to (...) (20 years ago, 13-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
