Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:43:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4665 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Interesting that you don't bother to address either of the two major
> points in my post
How could he??? You homos are wicked and that's good enough. Trying to
rationalize it will only get him into trouble. See John Neal's long history of
debate for countless examples of the style.
> Wrong way round: I was assuming that people here were *not* naive, and were
> aware of the wide range of sex acts and how many of them are common to
> differently oriented couples.
Yeah, this is something that bothers me about this BS "specific sex acts" line
of complaint. There's no outcry against heterosexual anal sex, e.g. So why
against the "specific acts" of homosexuality. (Ignoring your stats regarding
anal v. oral sex, for sake of ease.)
> Kevin
> ps generally: are we getting too graphic here even for debate?
Not for me. But then, you really couldn't.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| Interesting that you don't bother to address either of the two major points in my post, Lee (that heterosexuals frequently broadcast their sexual orientation by referring to the gender of their partners, and that sexual orientation is about (...) (20 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
