To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26016
26015  |  26017
Subject: 
Re: Lavender Brick Society
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:43:31 GMT
Viewed: 
4824 times
  
"John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:I473CK.1uzM@lugnet.com...

> Being gay presents a special problem, because their behavior is repulsive to
> heterosexuals.  I don't mean to offend gays, but it is the truth.

Maybe truth in your, as usual, twisted, bigotted,
totally-intolerant-to-any-lifestyle-but-those-EXACTLY-like-you mind, but I'm
strictly hetero, and I certainly don't find homo/bi repulsive.  Just not my bag.

Once again, just about the time I {might} start thinking there is a slight
possibility that you might be a decent human being, instead of an intolerant
bigot, you open your mouth again and blurt out your true feelings.



>  And this has nothing to do with a pathologically diagnosed phobia,
> so give the epithet "homophobe" a rest.

Well, until you submit to therapy to find out, you can deny it.  Convenient for
you.

Of course, {John} would never go to therapy.  It's obviously everyone else in
the world that has a problem, not {John}.  Even if {John}'s thoughts are
bigotted, narrow-minded, and thoroughly anti-freedom, it's got to be everyone
else that is wrong.




> > > > The way I read his original comment was that
> > > > despising LGBTs and their lifestyles is genetically built into humankind,
> > > > despite the fact that much of the modern world disproves his theory.
> > > 
> > > Specifically, the revulsion of heterosexuals by the idea of engaging in
> > > homosexual sex.
> > 
> > You've asked them all, have you? I would say many heterosexuals would
> > probably have such revulsion, but I wouldn't be arrogant enought to assume
> > they ALL do.
> 
> Well, the ones that didn't I wouldn't categorize as "heterosexual", but as
> "heterosexual with homosexual tendencies", or some other such qualification.

As usual - you might as well be a Bush, you spout "with us or against us"
against everyone.

Gee, people that weren't repulsed couldn't {possibly} just be more tolerant than
a Grade A Bigot like you, there must be something "wrong" with them.



Here I was in a good mood for getting back online, and John mucks it up with his
typical bigotry.


--
Tom Stangl
*http://www.vfaq.com/
*DSM Visual FAQ home
*http://www.vfaq.net/
*Prius Visual FAQ Home



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
"John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:I473CK.1uzM@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) goes (...) Even if " their behavior is repulsive to heterosexuals", it would not show in a forum. I hardly think that you can pick what MOC is built by a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR