Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 15:07:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1470 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
I was speaking specifically about sex with the same sex-- you know, GAY.
|
Knowing someone is gay doesn’t tell you anything about their sex life any more
than knowing someone is heterosexual tells you anything about their sex life. It
doesn’t tell you if they’ve ever had sex, or if they ever will.
Maybe I’m naive. Maybe sex is compulsory. I didn’t get that memo ;-)
Is there anyone here without any sexual attraction? Anyone? Does that mean
everyone’s gettin’ some? No? Then why do we assume everyone who is gay is having
sex, or will have sex, or wants to have sex? Is abstinence a heterosexual thing?
Amy
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) I was speaking specifically about sex with the same sex-- you know, GAY. (...) Well, even hetero PDA can be offensive. Sex should be a private thing. When people make private things public it is at the least embarrassing and at the most (...) (20 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
