To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25872
25871  |  25873
Subject: 
Re: “family-safe” ? (Re: Lavender Brick Society)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:26:42 GMT
Viewed: 
2990 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lee Meyer wrote:

   No, you didn’t get it. What I am saying is that YOU tolerate only those that believe the way you do, and anyone who does not agree with you you automatically place into the homophobic, hateful camp, whether they actually are homophobic or they have rational explanations for not agreeing with you.

Ah! So you’re merely incorrect.

Nope, I’m dead-on correct.

  
   Your intolerance for those that disagree with you is clear when you say they ought to cancel their posts, and the others who posted here that ‘homophobic’ posts (in other words, posts that do not approve of a lavender group) ought to be censored - you cannot handle anyone else’s opinions except those that affirm and approve of yours. You want to eliminate debate on the grounds that ALL opposition is irrational and hateful.

I think you’ve confused the sides here. You’ve described yourself pretty perfectly, as far as I can infer.


Again, nope. I described you to a tee. I’m not telling anyone they ought to cancel their posts like you have. I am for the debate if you’ve read these threads. I’m not in favor of censoring the discussion. You’re just (unsuccessfully) trying to frame my disagreement at there being a lgbti? group as me being for eliminating debate/supporting censorship. Sorry bud, that dog won’t hunt.

   Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Correction to my previous post
 
(...) I have to apologize to Chris as I misread the nested message and said he posted to ask the person to remove his posts - Scott Arthur did that. So I was wrong to say he called for it. I will say that Chris probably didn't have a problem with (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: “family-safe” ? (Re: Lavender Brick Society)
 
(...) Ah! So you're merely incorrect. (...) I think you've confused the sides here. You've described yourself pretty perfectly, as far as I can infer. Chris (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR