Subject:
|
Correction to my previous post
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:38:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3088 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lee Meyer wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lee Meyer wrote:
| |
No, you didn’t get it. What I am saying is that YOU tolerate only those
that believe the way you do, and anyone who does not agree with you you
automatically place into the homophobic, hateful camp, whether they
actually are homophobic or they have rational explanations for not agreeing
with you.
|
Ah! So you’re merely incorrect.
|
Nope, I’m dead-on correct.
| |
| |
Your intolerance for those that disagree with you is clear when you say
they ought to cancel their posts, and the others who posted here that
‘homophobic’ posts (in other words, posts that do not approve of a lavender
group) ought to be censored - you cannot handle anyone else’s opinions
except those that affirm and approve of yours. You want to eliminate debate
on the grounds that ALL opposition is irrational and hateful.
|
I think you’ve confused the sides here. You’ve described yourself pretty
perfectly, as far as I can infer.
|
Again, nope. I described you to a tee. I’m not telling anyone they ought to
cancel their posts like you have. I am for the debate if you’ve read these
threads. I’m not in favor of censoring the discussion. You’re just
(unsuccessfully) trying to frame my disagreement at there being a lgbti?
group as me being for eliminating debate/supporting censorship. Sorry bud,
that dog won’t hunt.
|
I have to apologize to Chris as I misread the nested message and said he posted
to ask the person to remove his posts - Scott Arthur did that. So I was wrong
to say he called for it. I will say that Chris probably didn’t have a problem
with Scott’s idea to do so, as he did not make a comment to the contrary.
Further, the fact still stands that someone in favor of the LGBT group did call
for another to self-censor/cancel their posts.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: “family-safe” ? (Re: Lavender Brick Society)
|
| (...) Nope, I'm dead-on correct. (...) Again, nope. I described you to a tee. I'm not telling anyone they ought to cancel their posts like you have. I am for the debate if you've read these threads. I'm not in favor of censoring the discussion. (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
