To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25871
25870  |  25872
Subject: 
Re: Lavender Brick Society
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org
Date: 
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:13:57 GMT
Viewed: 
53 times
  
Nope, what I was saying is that your own preconceived biases made you assume
that someone asking for a hetero group at this present time was doing so 'to get
even/keep up with the homosexual Joneses' rather than it being a legitimate
request.  You certainly had no qualms about asking him if it was really
necessary, but you had no such concern regarding the request for a gay group.
Bias, bias, bias, it's everywhere....

Who knows, maybe it was put forth by a heterosexual who just read about gays
wanting their own group, and thought, Hey that would be a good idea for us
straights too!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) I get it. You clearly didn't read what I said. You _might_ be right. There _might_ be people interested in such a hetero discussion group. But why would you assume a group is needed just because a homosexual group is asked for? Neither of you (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR