Debate : 25478


Off-Topic / Debate / 25478	25477 \| 25479

Subject:	Re: suspended Bricklink shops
Newsgroups:	lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:25:09 GMT
Viewed:	43 times

In lugnet.market.brickshops, Tim Courtney wrote: > In lugnet.market.brickshops, Scott Arthur wrote: > > > > Wow. 2500+ words! Is an executive summery available? > > > > > > > I have asked Dan privately to be > > > reinstated. > > > > IMHO this whole thing should have stayed private. > > > > Scott A > > > > PS Was cross posting to .general really req'd? > > What I find really sad in all of this is, though you're toeing a line and being > consistent in your arguments, you're *really* using this incident as an > opportunity to stick it to Larry. Pathetic, but expected. I'm not sure I agree; I wish this whole thing had stayed private. That said, think about this: what do you think Larry would have done if the tables were turned? Scott A

Message has 2 Replies:

		(canceled)

		Re: suspended Bricklink shops
(...) I believe honestly that if Larry saw exactly what played out leading up to his banning happen to you or Richard, he would support reinstating the banned member because of their earnest attempt to act in good faith in the situation (regardless (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: suspended Bricklink shops
(...) What I find really sad in all of this is, though you're toeing a line and being consistent in your arguments, you're really using this incident as an opportunity to stick it to Larry. Pathetic, but expected. -Tim (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search