Subject:
|
Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 20:29:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2177 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
Yeah. Ideally, under such a system the medium of exchange would simply be
the manhour.
|
But wouldn’t that play havoc with comparative advantage?
|
|
Hopefully. That’s the goal.
Not really. You have so many hours and then you’re dead and gone. Your hour
is worth an hour.
|
Communism. Essentially denies supply and demand. Interesting idea but it
didn’t seem to work, at least at some levels.
| |
| |
Nevertheless, it must be admitted that some people have invested more
manhours in training for (or in otherwise establishing) their vocations, so
a greater return on that investment is understandably desirable to them.
|
Misunderstandably. The thinking that one man deserves more for his hour of
labor than another is an anti-social paradigm that favors the lucky over the
unlucky. I’m smarter (or whatever) than 99% (or whatever) of people. Do I
really deserve a better standard of living than those 99%? I just drew the
lucky card -- so I get a lifetime of relative comfort and ease? I have a
very hard time expressing how screwed up I think that is. Is it not economic
might makes right? What’s the difference?
| |
Broadly speaking, I suppose that we already engage in something like this
manhour-based economy,
|
|
“Workhours” unless you are still in the dark ages. :-)
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) To the best of my knowledge -- limited as it is, no system of equitable socialism has been tried on this planet for 500 years since the peak of Hopi civilization. All of the modern communisims that I have read about (and talked to (...) (20 years ago, 10-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) That's how I meant it all along. Sorry for being unclear. You don't have to have people as stewards, though that might foster a philosophic advantage for society, so long as what's taxed is the wealth, regardless of who owns it. For the rest (...) (20 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
113 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
