To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25216
25215  |  25217
Subject: 
Re: Preaching to the Choir
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:51:28 GMT
Viewed: 
1928 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:

   I think I snipped it, but you asked for the proper tax rate for the wealthy. Here’s my suggestion: for one year, tax the wealthy at zero percent for anything that they earned on their own without help or protection from “society.” Anything in excess of, say, $500,000.00 that was acquired or “earned” under the military, economic, industrial, corporate, or consumerist protections of society should be eligible for taxation at a rate of 100%, since the individual is beholden to society for those earnings.

Why is income tax better than either of: a wealth tax or setting a common earnings per hour rate across the nation and acting as a public work clearinghouse?

I need to plead ignorance and ask for clarification: By “wealth tax” do you mean a tax on acquisitions/already-held holdings separate from income? And does “common earnings per hour rate” mean that everyone would get the same hourly wage regardless of profession?

Not trying to be obtuse. For all I know these might be well-established econmic terms that are unfamiliar to me.

Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Preaching to the Choir
 
(...) Oh, I was just making the terms up, for all I know. I guess I should have explicated. (...) Yes. I see it as a sure-fire loop-hole avoidance scheme. If all property is taxed, regardless of who owns it, then the rich -- even when trying to (...) (20 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Preaching to the Choir
 
(...) Why is income tax better than either of: a wealth tax or setting a common earnings per hour rate across the nation and acting as a public work clearinghouse? Chris (20 years ago, 9-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

113 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR